Jump to content


Photo

Genetica benchmarking.


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Funkdude

Funkdude

    Alien Genius

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,693 posts

Posted 25 June 2013 - 01:39 AM

Hi guys,

 

I'm in the market for a new pc, and wanted to see how my current system holds up.

 

I found a gtx suitable for benchmarking. Here are the settings used:

 

  • No AA
  • 1024x1024 render.
  • Time starts when you click render.

The time i got was 00:43,2.

My cinebench (release 11.5) score was 3.25 Pts on CPU.

 

 

My current system:

 

  • CPU: intel core quad Q6600 @ 3 GHz.
  • Mainboard: Asus P5N-D.
  • Memory: 4096 MB DDR2 @ 333.3 MHz.
  • GPU: Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB.

Here is the GTX used: Attached File  Genetica Benchmark.gtx   83.9KB   77 downloads

Get Cinebench here: http://www.maxon.net/?id=1258

 

If some of you with newer systems (which means most of you guys i assume haha) find the time to try and use the same gtx, and post their pc specs, i would greatly appreciate it, since the pc i will be buying is going to be used for Genetica a great deal


Edited by Funkdude, 25 June 2013 - 01:50 AM.


#2 MACK

MACK

    Active Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 25 June 2013 - 01:52 AM

Heya,

I ran the benchmark on an EVGA SR-2 running dual E5620 @2.4 Ghz.

Stock score is 14 seconds.

If I overclock to 4Ghz was 10 secs.  My Cinebench score @ 4Ghz is 13.4



#3 Funkdude

Funkdude

    Alien Genius

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,693 posts

Posted 25 June 2013 - 03:21 PM

Thanks! Does anyone have the i7 4770 K? That seems like a good processor, and a benchmark with it would be offer some insight.

#4 Silkrooster

Silkrooster

    Grandmaster

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,152 posts

Posted 25 June 2013 - 09:06 PM

I am getting an error trying to load your gtx file. Its saying I need a newer version of genetica and as far as I know 4.0 is the last version.



#5 Silkrooster

Silkrooster

    Grandmaster

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,152 posts

Posted 25 June 2013 - 09:20 PM

Specs:

Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
x64-based PC
Intel® Core™ i7 CPU       X 980  @ 3.33GHz, 3334 Mhz, 6 Core(s), 12 Logical Processor(s)
(RAM)    16.0 GB
 

Video specs:

 AMD Radeon HD 6570
Adapter RAM    (2,147,483,648) bytes
Driver Version    12.104.0.0
Resolution    1280 x 960 x 75 hertz
Bits/Pixel    32

Cinebench:

OpenGL 39.29 fps

cpu 8.82 pts

Time:47.34 sec.



#6 SpaceRay

SpaceRay

    Active Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 29 June 2013 - 02:56 AM

Thanks! Does anyone have the i7 4770 K? That seems like a good processor, and a benchmark with it would be offer some insight.

 

Hello, Sorry that I have been able to run the benchmark as I have a problem with Genetica now, but I can help with the Cinebench 11.5 Benchmark

 

Intel Core i7 2600K 3.5Ghz with 16GB RAM and Nvidia 9600 GTX 1GB = Cinebench Score 7.12  

 

And searching in google for a i7 4770K benchmark with Cinebench I found this website

 

http://www.play3r.ne...t-out-review/6/

 

Here is shown a cinebench 11.5 benchmark that gives the following results (all of them are with some overclocking as the normal one is 3.5Ghz)

 

i7 3770K at 3.9GHz = 7.12

i7 4770K at 3.9Ghz = 8.54

i7 3770K at 4.5Ghz = 9.07

i7 4770K at 4.5Ghz = 9.48

 

Is curious that in this one, the i7 3770K at overclocked 3.9 GHz gives the same score result as my i7 2600K at 3.5Ghz without any overclocking 

 

 

REVIEWS OF intel 4770K 

 

Here is a review from this very famous Tom´s Hardware website that may be useful to you and has 19 pages

 

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4770k-haswell-review,3521.html

 

Here is a review from this famous Xbit Labs website that may be useful to you and has 13 pages

 

http://www.xbitlabs....e-i7-4770k.html

 

 

USE THE GREAT, HELPFUL AND USEFUL BENCHMARK TOOL COMPARISON OF ANANDTECH

 

For you to make your own comparisons you can use the very well done and updated benchmark tool that you can find in the Anandtech website

 

Dual chip comparison

 

For example if you want to compare your own Q6600 chip with any newer one, for example the i74770K, you have to go the right part and choose your Q6600 as the first chip and then below choose the i7 4770K and click on "view comparison"

 

I have done it already for you here with this example 

 

http://www.anandtech...oduct/53?vs=836

 

Benchmark software comparison

 

Or you can choose in the right part the benchmarking software of your choice and click on the "view benchmark results"

 

For example I have done already for you the Cinebench 11.5 Multithreaded

 

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/345

 

In this one you can see better the real perfomance of the chip without overclocking

 

i7 3770K 3.5 Ghz = 7.61

i7 4770K 3.5 Ghz = 8.07

 

C4D CINEBENCH BENCHMARK SCORES TABLE

 

You can also see the table of scores of Cinebench 11.5 that have been submitted to the C4D website

 

http://www.c4dcafe.c.../cinebench.html


Edited by SpaceRay, 29 June 2013 - 03:44 AM.


#7 Funkdude

Funkdude

    Alien Genius

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,693 posts

Posted 29 June 2013 - 07:29 AM

Wow Spaceray! That's incredibly thorough, many thanks for that. Ill read it through, the i7 4770 K is coming my way, and I believe we will over clock it too a bit. So far, when I get a new PC or upgrade, ill have super fast Genetica pleasure, but the complexity of what I make skyrockets as well, so overall better results, higher res, but near same timespan in creating it. I can't wait though, since the uv operations will be significantly faster on my new system, meaning fancy uv mapped things like directional weathering, AO renders, and edge based weathering. This combined with hand painted textures will look sweet I hope. (With hand painted I mean using Genetica made brushes to apply a Genetica made seamless material with effect maps, it looks so good it feels like cheating haha. I hope I have something to show soon :D)

Also, thanks! Seriously :).

#8 Funkdude

Funkdude

    Alien Genius

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,693 posts

Posted 29 June 2013 - 07:32 AM

Thanks silkrooster! It seems you have a pretty good system!

Do you still have issues opening the gtx? Perhaps there is a bug saved in there.

Edited by Funkdude, 29 June 2013 - 07:35 AM.


#9 Funkdude

Funkdude

    Alien Genius

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,693 posts

Posted 29 June 2013 - 07:53 AM

I wonder if a D-wave quantum computer could run Genetica, and how fast it would be, working on it haha.

#10 Atlas

Atlas

    Staff

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,508 posts

Posted 01 July 2013 - 09:44 AM

If it says you need a newer version then uninstall Genetica and reinstall it from our website.  When we did the release we put out a very minor bugfix a few days later that you might not have.



#11 Atlas

Atlas

    Staff

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,508 posts

Posted 01 July 2013 - 09:49 AM

I have a 1.5 year old laptop with an i7-2670QM @ 2.2Ghz.  It rendered your texture in 18.5 seconds.



#12 Allen 1

Allen 1

    Alien Genius

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,258 posts

Posted 01 July 2013 - 04:59 PM

I wonder if a D-wave quantum computer could run Genetica, and how fast it would be, working on it haha.

Funny, I read about those in Popular Mechanics over ten years ago. That and DNA Computers, Neural Chips, and the like.



#13 Silkrooster

Silkrooster

    Grandmaster

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,152 posts

Posted 01 July 2013 - 08:36 PM

If it says you need a newer version then uninstall Genetica and reinstall it from our website.  When we did the release we put out a very minor bugfix a few days later that you might not have.

Ah OK, will do...



#14 MACK

MACK

    Active Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 17 July 2013 - 12:44 AM

Atlas,

I just thought of an interesting idea.

You could offer a "Free Genetica CPU Benchmark" version of Genetica.  It would include some basic tools such as start and stop times, and selectable resolutions and perhaps some pre-made GTX stored inside the program itself that were selectable. (Standard loading of .gtx would be disabled)

 

This would do a couple of things:

1. It would be a very good multi-processor / multi-core benchmark that stressed the CPU.

2. It would be free advertising to the people that do benchmarking (and would then see your product, and what it can do for them). I am sure some really cool images would amaze a lot of people!


Edited by MACK, 17 July 2013 - 12:45 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users